6-Jan-06
Dear
LUTSF
Please find enclosed the requested report following
my trip to the FREQUENT FLYERS AERIAL DANCE FESTIVAL in Boulder, Colorado. I
attended from 28th July until 6th August 2005. I
apologise for the late arrival of this report and hope that this will not
forfeit my award.
The purpose of my project was to gain and develop
existing dance and aerial skills, using them in performance and choreography.
It was fascinating to see how practitioners based in the US and also other
countries such as Austria, New Zealand, Canada, France and several others, all
differently interpret the generic term ‘aerial dance’ and practice it.
I took part in several classes during my stay and
also took the opportunity to observe a class entitled, ‘Poetics of aerial
performance’. This gave me the perfect opportunity to observe Keith Hennessey
work with the group to investigate where aerial dance movement comes from, how
to generate it and most importantly (and my area of concern when choreographing
aerial dance theatre work), the intelligent use of equipment to enhance a theme
rather than glorify the piece of equipment being used.
I
attended the ‘bungee dance’ class, and while learning this concept in a very
different form to my own, I was also able to share my technique by teaching the
other participants of the group certain elements of it, enlightening them to
other ways of using bungee when also combining dance.
Observing Keith during ‘Poetics of aerial
performance’ was one of the highlights of my time at the festival. He paid
attention to detail of transitions between movements, concern over the use of
‘circus’ equipment to organically lift movement into the air and focussed on
how to use it when there. I was so excited that there was someone from my field
that was concerned with exactly the same focus as myself. The subsequent post-session
conversations we had together and discussions about how to handle this very
issue, teach and make people aware of its importance in every aspect of their
work was a real high point for me.
Another wonderful element of the festival was having
the freedom to become absorbed during the session, to be guided through and
follow an idea from beginning to end, exhausting possibilities and physical
choices without the pressure of producing a finished result. I was inspired by
Keith’s teaching and took the opportunity to soak up his knowledge and unique
ways of working in the hope that I may consider these in my own way in the
future. In addition to this, to attend such a specific event with experienced
practitioners who are all willing to share ideas, knowledge and specific
techniques was a rare and incredible experience. I feel extremely fortunate to
have been a part of the festival.
I would recommend this festival to any other
dancer/aerialist and even to dancers who wish to begin learning aerial skills
and are interested in exploring ‘dancing in the air’. Classes ranged from
beginner level through to advanced, so allowed all participants the chance to
develop at their own level. By attending the festival I achieved so many
things. Not only the goals I had set out to, but I also took advantage of the
networking possibilities that this event brings with it. I made some good
friends, forged links with performers and experienced teachers from all over
the world with whom I am regularly communicating; all this as well as
introducing my technique to an audience eager to explore and understand it.
I also feel that through the support from the LUTSF I
have been able to promote the work that you do, and in turn support a unique
festival helping it to grow to provide even more opportunities each year.
Totally inspired by the teaching of Keith Hennessey
and in addition to my aerial technique classes, I hope to provide ‘aerial
choreographic workshops’ to share my newfound information. His teaching also
drew attention to the fact that you learn an awful lot by ‘doing’ so by
teaching these new findings I hope to develop my own approach the more I do it
too.
I
am also exploring the possibility of writing an article that explores the term
‘aerial dance’. I am aware there are many
interpretations worldwide and I personally feel that clarification and more
descriptive terms would benefit everyone’s understanding of this genre.
As I explained in my application I have been
commissioned by Dance Northwest to create a piece of aerial dance theatre and
the devising period began in August 05. I returned from FFADF to begin working
on it. It is without doubt that my work was influenced by my findings and
experience from the festival. My concerns lay with using the bungee purely to
enhance my theme and I focussed on the transition on and off of the bungee
during the piece; the subtle details that in essence provide the essential
foundations for a striking piece of work.
I can’t thank you enough for the opportunity to
attend this festival. It has been the most wonderful experience and one that
has without doubt enlightened me to how other countries and practitioners
approach ‘aerial dance’. It has answered many questions, but more importantly
for me opened up many more doors and questions to continue my journey of
discovery in this relatively raw genre. As well as learning new skills and
experiencing different approaches to teaching it also filled me with
confidence. Bungee-assisted dance is something I wholeheartedly believe in, and
having shared it with both experienced practitioners and participants I am now
more confident than ever that I must continue its evolution until it is seen
worldwide as an aerial technique in itself.
I have enclosed two photocopies of this letter and
the report along with the CD with both of these documents copied onto it. I
regret to inform you that we were not able to take any photographs or video
footage of the classes. Most tutors felt it an invasion of privacy.
Kind
regards
Wendy
Hesketh
P.S.
I am very pleased to announce that I have recently launched my website. I would
love you to have a look at it. There is a mention of The Lisa Ullmann Travel
Scholarship Fund in it too – flying your flag high!
www.wiredaerialtheatre.com. Thanks again.
THE LISA ULLMANN TRAVELLING SCHOLARSHIP FUND REPORT
In
July 2005 I was lucky enough to attend the Frequent Flyers Aerial Dance
Festival (FFADF) in Boulder, Colorado. After patiently waiting for the list of
workshops to be advertised on the website I eagerly signed up for bungee
dance, poetics of aerial performance, contact improvisation
and womyn’s work which carried me through from 9am to 7pm each day. In
addition to these classes there were also discussion groups, lecture
demonstrations and performances by the class tutors.
Before I left I received all the information I needed
through the post, and had to laugh when the first sheet warned me of the high
altitude and oxygen usage. Performing at height at various sites, in all sorts
of weather conditions for several years now, I had to giggle at the thought of
me being concerned about the altitude. The smile however quickly faded, as I
found myself puffing and panting up one of the hills on the university campus
on my way to the second lesson of the day! I was pleased though at how quickly
my body adjusted to the change of altitude and I found the rest of the cycle
journeys relatively painless.
I had many reasons for attending this unique,
emerging festival. I wished to gain and develop existing aerial and dance
skills as well as take the opportunity while surrounded by like-minded
practitioners, to explore and develop choreographic possibilities when
combining both dance and aerial skills.
I had set clear goals to achieve during my visit. I
wished to develop my aerial dance performance and seek choreographic guidance
from international aerial practitioners, with the possibility of sharing the
technique I have been developing since 2000 (bungee-assisted dance) with other
aerial artists. You can imagine how elated I was to find ‘bungee dance’ as one
of the workshops on offer on the programme. Armed with my specially designed
(hand made) bungee harness I traveled to the USA ready to learn ‘bungee dance’
and swap notes of my technical findings with the teachers too.
As I entered the workshop space on the first morning
of the festival I was totally shocked to find a scaffolding tower (being used
to access the loops of bungee cord hanging from rigging in the ceiling) and the
teachers bouncing around in what can only be described as adult sized,
glorified baby bouncers. Feet did not touch the floor and movements comprised
of vertical bouncing, forwards and backwards somersaults while holding onto the
bungee attachments at the sides of their body. This instantly made me question
the title of the workshop, and in fact instigated an interest in the necessity
of the use of correct and accurate terminology when labeling elements of a new
art form. I realize that ‘aerial dance’ as a form in itself is relatively new
and as such has many interpretations, but when combining the words ‘bungee’ and
‘dance’ in explanatory phrase, my expectation was to see a good balance of both
of these skills.
I suppose ‘bungee-assisted dance’ and ‘bungee dance’
could sound like they were one in the same but in actual fact they couldn’t be
more different. Bungee dance involved being connected to two equal
lengths of bungee cord, attached to either side of the waist. Participants were
taught to use their own body weight to produce a bounce in an upward and
downward motion. Vertical, forward and backward somersaults were possible and
other upward and downward bouncing movements. As you were totally suspended and
had a bungee cord connected to each side of your waist the hands are for the
majority amount of time, tugging them in order to propel the body back up into
the air again. This limits arm and leg movements. With bungee-assisted dance,
one connection at the back of the harness allows the arms free range of
movement and allows the arms and legs to be used creatively and expressively
instead of functionally. It is also ground-based.
As the week progressed so did the lengths of bungee
cord, enabling participants to manage to touch the floor with their feet for a
fraction of a second if they put enough power into it. This meant more height
and possibly more somersaults, but I was still searching for the ‘dance’
element within this concept. Music was played and as I understood, to the
instructors this was dance movement on bungees.
As we hit our third day I asked if I could use a
small area of their rigging set-up in a different way to show them the
technique I have been developing. I call my technique, ‘bungee-assisted dance’
and I feel this is an absolutely accurate description of the technique. The
bungee enables me or assists me to dance in a particular way. There was
a rush of interest towards me as I began to show the possibilities of what my
technique allows, and within the hour most people had tried the technique for
themselves. We turned climbing harnesses around and used them in the way that I
had originally, five years ago at the beginning of my research. People were
eager to experience the feeling of ground-based flight that this technique
gives you, even if it meant a little discomfort in their rather unsuitable
harness setup.
Speaking with participants afterwards brought to
light that by having their feet on the floor and being able to perform dance
movements with the ‘option’ of using the bungees assistance, enabled them to
really explore a whole new world of aerial movement possibilities with
ground-based dance as the source.
For me, bungee-assisted
dance is about having the choice of when to use it within a dance. I can
dance normally and not engage the bungee at all, but then decide to use it in
some massive or subtle way to assist my movement and theme. And at all times
the bungee is never referenced, I very rarely hold it or touch it with hands at
all as this removes the illusion of natural yet exaggerated flight.
With my experience of the bungee dance set up
I would reference this as ‘bungee bouncing’ I felt no opportunity to convey any
emotion or bring my own expression to the movement but instead found myself
performing a range of tricks of a gymnastic form, the element of freedom and
choice vanished into the distance. In saying this I by no means attack the
form, only question its technical name.
This
has thrown up massive questions in my practice and has alarmed me as to future
terminology in the artistic world that I live. Could a person who had no aerial
experience, wear a harness and hang in the air moving their limbs around to
music and expect the audience to realize this as aerial dance? This of course
is a much larger issue to tackle but it stresses my argument for a more
accurate use of terminology at such a crucial stage of development in the
aerial world.
Although initially disappointed at the bungee dance
lessons the consequences of participating in the classes opened up many more
issues I am interested in, allowed me to expose my technique and collect
crucial feedback of it for reference at a later stage. There were several other
classes I had enrolled on and the most inspiring of these was ‘poetics of
aerial performance’ led by Keith Hennessey, a charismatic, feisty Canadian,
“physical performer” (his own words) that enjoyed using aerial equipment but
was, “by no means very strong or an expert in the air” (again, his own words).
I chose to observe this class as a major focus point when choreographing using
my technique is that I don’t use it as an opportunity to perform tricks and
therefore glorify its presence, but simply wish to enhance dance movement. The
majority of participants were circus performers and very skillful on silks,
rope, hoop and trapeze. Keith led the group through numerous stimulating
exercises of exploration making them aware of different things that each of
them do habitually. He worked on breaking habits down, seeing the
apparatus/piece of equipment not as something to climb on or hold a position
and present for applause, but as an object that had a specific theatrical use
within an improvisation. I saw also that with each lesson he gained more trust
from the group and as a result could ask more from them, really stretching both
physical and theatrical skills to the limit. As a spectator this was beneficial
in two ways, firstly I was able to note down his method and exercises as they
happened – when participating it is difficult to remember everything in detail
and in the correct order, and secondly it provided the opportunity to watch how
participants interpreted information, and dialogue with Keith during these
sessions made clear why he was setting such tasks, where he was hoping to lead
them on their individual exploration and the conclusion of why go through it
all anyway?
Keith was an inspiration both as a performer and as
an educator and he was honest in his aerial abilities, but the way in which he
approached aerial equipment and used theatre and dance in performance, far
exceeded any virtuoso on a trapeze looking for applause after each obviously
technically demanding move.
Keith
and I share the need for honesty in performance and the chance to engage in conversation
that included this as well as further investigation into his teaching methods
and where he gets his inspiration from was literally priceless.
The rest of the time at the festival was spent
learning specific skills, approaching contact improvisation differently and
spending time absorbed within a woman only group entitled, womyns work.
These all informed me of different approaches to teaching and also made me
aware of how I as an individual would approach each learning process. [This
connects with Keith’s lectures on formed habits of performers, creators and
teachers]. The feeling of freedom and liberation engulfed me from the outset
and the cycle ride home each evening would feel similar to how I imagined Julie
Andrews to feel when running across the open mountain tops of Austria ready to
break into ‘The Sound of Music’.
There was an amazing sense of family-like support, an
open mindedness and sharing to the whole event, which is something I have never
experienced before in similar setups. I believe the reason for this is that we
are all searching. There are no rights or wrongs, only possibilities and
avenues to explore. This emerging aerial world is an adventure playground and I
believe it is within our role of adventurers/explorers to be as clear in our
findings and teachings as we possibly can. I found confidence in sharing
artistic opinions and concerns for the academic development of this exciting
and relatively new genre. I hope that festivals such as this go from strength
to strength, uniting many more professionals to source, develop and promote
this form.
LUTSF made it possible for me to attend this
festival. Without their help I could never have hoped to go. My findings,
research and physical goals were all accomplished with much more besides. The
most exciting result of all is that I now have different goals, different
questions and ideas to improve bungee-assisted dance technique. I am
eager to provide more opportunities for people to learn this skill, to widen
their skill base and to develop the new teaching methods learned from Keith and
Kim (amongst others) for myself. This festival inspired me creatively and my
findings have without doubt fed into my work since my return, helping me
approach the devising period of my next aerial dance theatre piece, “She lies
with me…” very differently. Some breakthroughs were immediate but the most
satisfying breakthroughs are those which I experienced a couple of months after
my return. I am excited in the belief that I still have a few more around the
corner.